|
|
Post by Ian-Halifax on Aug 8, 2016 11:17:55 GMT -5
Any chance we can get a final ruling on this before we get too deep into RFA? Who is automatically protected, how many at each position can we protect? Are we going to have a rule about the number of people we must expose, or just a rule on the number of people we can protect? I feel like this is all pretty important to know before making decisions in RFA.
|
|
|
|
Post by Scott-New York on Aug 9, 2016 19:18:36 GMT -5
Any chance we can get a final ruling on this before we get too deep into RFA? Who is automatically protected, how many at each position can we protect? Are we going to have a rule about the number of people we must expose, or just a rule on the number of people we can protect? I feel like this is all pretty important to know before making decisions in RFA. Any chance at all?... |
|
|
|
Post by Scott-New Jersey on Aug 10, 2016 8:20:49 GMT -5
Selective hearing the Hockey Wife has on this
|
|
|
|
Post by Glenn-Philadelphia on Aug 10, 2016 8:32:38 GMT -5
Sorry boys. I haven't had the time to weed back through this thread (and any other associated threads) to consolidate all of the talking points. This is yet another reason that moving forward these discussions will be held in a skype call by anyone who has enough of a vested interest to attend. I think the post on the top of page 2 sums it up pretty well though. gtgfhl.proboards.com/post/33887/thread |
|
|
|
Post by Dane-Hamilton on Aug 10, 2016 8:43:26 GMT -5
Selective hearing the Hockey Wife has on this Let's try and sum it up Each team can protect 7 Forwards, 3 Defensemen, 1 Goalie OR 8 Skaters and 1 Goalie Automatically ProtectedAny drafted player RFA 2018 or later Someone can help fill in exposure requirements but I think that is just overcomplicating things. |
|
|
|
Post by Matt-Syracuse on Aug 10, 2016 9:33:57 GMT -5
That seems to be how I read it. And I am behind the two NHL cards rule.
|
|
|
|
Post by Matt-Syracuse on Aug 10, 2016 9:34:36 GMT -5
THis draft will occur after this season?
|
|
|
|
Post by Glenn-Philadelphia on Aug 10, 2016 11:37:12 GMT -5
Correct Matt. A little less than a year from now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Scott-New Jersey on Aug 10, 2016 12:22:19 GMT -5
Selective hearing the Hockey Wife has on this Let's try and sum it up Each team can protect 7 Forwards, 3 Defensemen, 1 Goalie OR 8 Skaters and 1 Goalie Automatically ProtectedAny drafted player RFA 2018 or later Someone can help fill in exposure requirements but I think that is just overcomplicating things. Thught we said any 2018 and after RFA where protected. |
|
|
|
Post by Scott-New Jersey on Aug 10, 2016 12:25:01 GMT -5
I thought there was some discussion on this applying to drafted players only but to keep it simple we could go with any RFA unless someone can suggest why we shouldn't. Simple |
|
|
|
Post by Glenn-Philadelphia on Aug 10, 2016 12:26:55 GMT -5
Any non-bridged RFAs. Guys can't bridge a player just to protect him.
|
|
|
|
Post by Scott-New York on Aug 11, 2016 12:16:47 GMT -5
Selective hearing the Hockey Wife has on this Let's try and sum it up Each team can protect 7 Forwards, 3 Defensemen, 1 Goalie OR 8 Skaters and 1 Goalie Automatically ProtectedAny drafted player RFA 2018 or later Someone can help fill in exposure requirements but I think that is just overcomplicating things. I believe the exposure was two forwards and one defenseman who played 40 games in the previous season or 70 in the previous two and one goaltender who is signed through 2017-18 or is a tendered RFA after next season (we could just say RFA since our RFA's are all considered tendered) |
|
|
|
Post by Chris-Alaska on Aug 12, 2016 19:31:00 GMT -5
Let's try and sum it up Each team can protect 7 Forwards, 3 Defensemen, 1 Goalie OR 8 Skaters and 1 Goalie Automatically ProtectedAny drafted player RFA 2018 or later Someone can help fill in exposure requirements but I think that is just overcomplicating things. I believe the exposure was two forwards and one defenseman who played 40 games in the previous season or 70 in the previous two and one goaltender who is signed through 2017-18 or is a tendered RFA after next season (we could just say RFA since our RFA's are all considered tendered) Not that this isn't true to the NHL but this was never confirmed by Glenn for the GHL I dont think so as of now there aren't any exposure requirements. |
|
|
|
Post by Ian-Halifax on Aug 13, 2016 12:00:29 GMT -5
Glenn, can we get a final ruling on this? From my understanding it looks like the rules as of now are:
Teams can protect:
7 forwards, 3 defensemen, 1 goalie
Or
8 skaters, 1 goalie
All 2018+ RFAs are automatically protected.
Is that what we're going with?
|
|
|
|
Post by Glenn-Philadelphia on Aug 13, 2016 12:05:32 GMT -5
Close, its all 2018+ Unbridged RFAs are protected automatically. I think the other thing we have yet to nail down solidly is what must be exposed by each team.
|
|
