|
Post by Glenn-Philadelphia on Mar 2, 2023 14:07:24 GMT -5
We would have no idea even if we did see the code... Bingo.
|
|
|
Post by Phil-Cornwall on Mar 2, 2023 14:43:11 GMT -5
No sir!
I have coded several success businesses to include uplink with Musk satellite system.
I have secondary associate degree in Coding of Computers.
I have several colleagues in Ukraine and I also program drones.
Your Sports simulation will be easy for me to see.
|
|
|
Post by Chris-Suffolk on Mar 2, 2023 16:51:42 GMT -5
Colleagues in Ukraine? Azov's perhaps?
|
|
|
Post by Jon-Seattle on Mar 2, 2023 23:32:07 GMT -5
oh I dunno. We could. Seattle is well versed in 'code', I thought. 60% of the time it works every time….100% success rate
|
|
|
Post by Chris-Suffolk on Mar 8, 2023 9:54:46 GMT -5
Been looking at my team's performance this year.
1-Most of my players, especially my top 6, have been taking more shots. Taking more shots, but scoring less. 2-ALL of my players have a SHOOTING PERCENTAGE Less Than their NHL Average. I checked in on our GHL Top 5 scorers...and all of them are scoring "AT or ABOVE" their NHL Shooting Percentage. ( EXCEPTION: Gaunce )
I wonder why that is? Obviously it's related to the formula Shots/Goals Scored...but how and why my team is consistently affected negatively versus those who are consistently affected positively. The coincidence is puzzling and annoying.
What changes, IF ANY, have been made to the engine?
If any, please explain in layman's terms and not code.
PS: Suffolk used to have/own a large advantage in Shots taken per game vs Opponents but, not in goals scored. Now, Suffolk does not have/own a Shot advantage and our games are even closer of late. Scary for Suffolk...Scarier!
Changes to help the less fortunate? Hand outs? Trophies for everyone? Just looking for answers.
|
|