|
Post by Chris-Suffolk on Jun 25, 2019 19:42:20 GMT -5
I think the "current" RFA's needing to be resigned or dropped on our rosters are showing up in BLACK ( 2018-19 ) and next years RFA's are listed in RED...
For ex:
Vladislav Kamenev should be an RFA to resign this off season...listed in BLACK Austun Matthews is an RFA next season...listed in RED
|
|
|
Post by Glenn-Philadelphia on Jun 26, 2019 11:26:35 GMT -5
I am not so sure you aren't correct. I will do some digging when i am home.
In fact the more I look at it, I think you are dead on.
|
|
|
Post by Glenn-Philadelphia on Jun 26, 2019 15:59:55 GMT -5
OK, I started looking at this and everything looked good. Then I recalled what was causing the confusion. Normally at this time of year I have a few more boxes on the team pages turned on (Missing players, UFAs, RFAs, etc) Thats where the current guys who are owed a contract go. The red and blue is there to show you guys that will be expiring at the end of the upcoming season so all is well there. I think this will all be clear once I get the other tables turned back on.
|
|
|
Post by Chris-Suffolk on Jun 29, 2019 10:46:15 GMT -5
When would you think the RFA asking prices will be determined? May need to get an idea of team salaries sooner rather than later. May also make a difference to some teams with many rfa's and many draft picks, as these things add up quickly.
|
|
|
Post by Chris-Suffolk on Jul 28, 2019 12:15:13 GMT -5
Curiosity questions:
1) If Team A has a UFA, but wants to trade that UFA to Team B...Can Team B pay the FP points for the "Re-Signing of that UFA"?
2) Can FP's be traded in a player trade? Ex: Patrick Kane traded for 100 FP's and a Prospect or Pick?
3) Is Question #2 something that is a possibility in the future, if not already allowed? Or, it something nobody is in favor of?
I'd Prefer Glenn answer these questions. No offense to you all, but after all, Glenn has the first and last say.
|
|
|
Post by Glenn-Philadelphia on Jul 29, 2019 6:57:43 GMT -5
Curiosity questions: 1) If Team A has a UFA, but wants to trade that UFA to Team B...Can Team B pay the FP points for the "Re-Signing of that UFA"? No, this only can be used to sign guys that were with your team the whole previous year. This means that he could not have been traded after the season started.2) Can FP's be traded in a player trade? Ex: Patrick Kane traded for 100 FP's and a Prospect or Pick? There is no provision for this currently but I have thought there might be some room for modification int his area now that FPs can be used to sign a UFA as in #1 above .3) Is Question #2 something that is a possibility in the future, if not already allowed? Or, it something nobody is in favor of? My answer above bit I would invite others to add commentary on this question as well.I'd Prefer Glenn answer these questions. No offense to you all, but after all, Glenn has the first and last say.
|
|
|
Post by Eric-Baltimore on Jul 29, 2019 7:14:29 GMT -5
Curiosity questions: 1) If Team A has a UFA, but wants to trade that UFA to Team B...Can Team B pay the FP points for the "Re-Signing of that UFA"? No, this only can be used to sign guys that were with your team the whole previous year. This means that he could not have been traded after the season started.2) Can FP's be traded in a player trade? Ex: Patrick Kane traded for 100 FP's and a Prospect or Pick? There is no provision for this currently but I have thought there might be some room for modification int his area now that FPs can be used to sign a UFA as in #1 above .3) Is Question #2 something that is a possibility in the future, if not already allowed? Or, it something nobody is in favor of? My answer above bit I would invite others to add commentary on this question as well.I'd Prefer Glenn answer these questions. No offense to you all, but after all, Glenn has the first and last say. I wouldn't mind FPs being trade-able assets. Although it would provide a path to bypass your answer to question 1: Team B would include the 75 FPs in the trade. I assume Team A would need to have enough FPs to cover the resign before the trade, but Team B would essentially be paying the points.
|
|
|
Post by Jedediah-Hartford on Jul 29, 2019 9:08:43 GMT -5
I would think that based on the current practice where teams occasionally cover all or a specified part of FPs in getting trades completed, it could be argued that they are already being used in a similar way. Saying "Team A is covering all of a 20 FP trade" isn't really that different from saying "Team A sends 10 FP to Team B as part of trade" and then having each cover their respective half of that 20 FP.
|
|
|
Post by Glenn-Philadelphia on Jul 29, 2019 9:39:47 GMT -5
I wouldn't mind FPs being trade-able assets. Although it would provide a path to bypass your answer to question 1: Team B would include the 75 FPs in the trade. I assume Team A would need to have enough FPs to cover the resign before the trade, but Team B would essentially be paying the points. The big difference would be that because a team can only do this for one UFA a year, they would be precluded from making a trade like this and keeping another player that they wanted.
|
|