|
Post by Brian-Cleveland on Apr 23, 2016 15:55:49 GMT -5
I don't think anybody is asking Glenn to do our homework. Just like Scott I've already put in some time. But the sooner Glenn can put up the list the sooner we can do our deeper lists.
|
|
|
Post by Scott-New Jersey on Apr 23, 2016 19:10:48 GMT -5
So the pull down tab on the player card should be good enough.
|
|
|
Post by Scott-New Jersey on Apr 24, 2016 14:52:17 GMT -5
How long before a card preview?
|
|
|
Post by Glenn-Philadelphia on Apr 24, 2016 15:25:42 GMT -5
Well now that the Flyers season is over, soon as opposed to later. I spent about 6 or 7 hours this weekend working on streamlining the data retrieval process which will make things a bit easier in subsequent years. When I am getting close I will be posting something.
|
|
|
Post by Scott-New York on Apr 24, 2016 15:55:32 GMT -5
I love this time of year, not to take anything away from the playoffs but I think talking about the new cards, seeing the new cards and the draft are definitely my favorite events
|
|
|
Post by John-Michigan on Jun 6, 2016 10:23:43 GMT -5
Glenn if you can also check out my entire roster, it can't be that bad can it?
|
|
|
Post by Steve-Chicago on Jun 6, 2016 12:19:32 GMT -5
If these are right I am royally screwed
|
|
|
Post by Phil-Cornwall on Jun 6, 2016 13:14:23 GMT -5
Glenn if you can also check out my entire roster, it can't be that bad can it? Glenn may actually find worse numbers...not sure I'd stir up that pot.
|
|
|
Post by Glenn-Philadelphia on Jun 6, 2016 16:29:29 GMT -5
D is down lower than it should be for NHL caliber D-men. Off ratings look good on average.
As far as forwards go everything looks to be within tolerance. This means both O and D look good.
I will be implementing a small fix sometime shortly
|
|
|
Post by Glenn-Philadelphia on Jun 6, 2016 17:12:59 GMT -5
OK, D fix has been applied, RFAs have been added and Draft picks are showing up again. Time to get some dinner.
|
|
|
Post by Scott-New Jersey on Jun 6, 2016 18:29:39 GMT -5
retained overseas players?
|
|
|
Post by John-Michigan on Jun 6, 2016 21:13:49 GMT -5
I was making fun of myself you nit wits...Detroit tanks are ready for next year
|
|
|
Post by Chris-Alaska on Jun 7, 2016 8:24:00 GMT -5
Can you take a look at Jonathan Drouin's card? Obviously his fort will be low but I think he has an AHL card and would think his ratings should be based off his NHL stats.
|
|
|
Post by Phil-Cornwall on Jun 7, 2016 9:11:13 GMT -5
Can you take a look at Jonathan Drouin's card? Obviously his fort will be low but I think he has an AHL card and would think his ratings should be based off his NHL stats. Hafta agree. He played 70 games a year ago, and 21 this year. Based on his ppg and mins played he oughta clock out in the 80's oaf-fence-ivly.
|
|
|
Post by Glenn-Philadelphia on Jun 7, 2016 10:12:34 GMT -5
For guys that split time in the NHL and AHL values are generated for both leagues and the card generator will take the higher ratings (after both are nerfed for not playing significant number of games).
In looking at his card online it is using his nerfed NHL stats. You can determine this by the pro team name (TBL) associated with the card. For someone who only played 21 games, the generator limits the 100 scores to a maximum of 45. You can see that his Off/Shoot/Shot/Pass were all throttled in this way.
He did look good in the playoffs but we don't use playoff games as part of the card generation process.
Long story short, yes, his card values are less than I would expect after watching him however we would enter a slippery slope (one I do not wish to tread) if we would arbitrarily decide to increase or decrease a specific players card. I would much rather let the hard numbers generate the cards.
That being said, I am guessing he is going to have a killer year and an awesome card next year.
|
|