|
|
Post by Joe-Adirondack on Jan 9, 2014 12:05:31 GMT -5
He is a new owner has someone sent him a message about this
|
|
|
|
Post by John-Michigan on Feb 3, 2014 21:28:53 GMT -5
Bump
|
|
|
|
Post by Phil-Cornwall on Feb 3, 2014 22:12:21 GMT -5
If Ottawa is the only team your are alerting us to (we can't read minds) then nothing will be done to get them back into compliance as they are now an absentee team. Rudderless |
|
|
|
Post by Scott-New Jersey on Feb 3, 2014 22:30:52 GMT -5
Ottawa-44 players & 3 goalies
Hershey-3 goalies
Quebec-4 goalies
St Paul-3 goalies
|
|
|
|
Post by Glenn-Philadelphia on Feb 3, 2014 23:05:36 GMT -5
If Ottawa is the only team your are alerting us to (we can't read minds) then nothing will be done to get them back into compliance as they are now an absentee team. Rudderless They aren't. Glenn's friend JP in Quebec is a goalie short, Glenn's nephew in Hershey is short 2, and Justin from St.Paul as well. What is the rational behind making sure guys make trades and have the right number of magic points to spend when we don't have to adhere to all the rules, that all 3 of these guys knew about? I like all these guys, so it isn't out of malice I bring this up, but why are certain rules enforced and others not Glenn? All 3 of these teams have a month till the deadline to get some goalies and players. Lets take baby steps. Say each team has to have at least 4. Then every team can jettison a goalie to these teams. If one team just needs any player that should be easy as well. I don't understand how teams can be permitted to play in the playoffs/regular season with their roster out of compliance, but heaven forbid Adam from Milwaukee last year couldn't name his team the Deer Ticks. I'm not looking to start a bidding war on any of these guys. I have 6 goalies and 48 players will just GIVE some away so that takes the black market aspect. Colorado had to give up a pick to grab a goalie with no future so he had 5. How is this fair to the guys that follow the rules? There is a month left, all these teams have F-points. Whats preventing the enforcement of these rules? Step off and cease being a tool bag. |
|
|
|
Post by Phil-Cornwall on Feb 4, 2014 9:18:22 GMT -5
I didn't know aboot those owner teams...hmmm
I think we had a discussion where 'all the goalies are taken' or there aren't enough ?
Glenn...you should find 7 ECHL goalies with 10 / 10 cards and 100K and start dishin' em out.
|
|
|
|
Post by Scott-New York on Feb 4, 2014 10:30:19 GMT -5
There are enough goalies for every team to be in compliance as far as I can tell. Hell, Hershey only had two until we struck a deal to get him another. Maybe we could drop the minimum to four. I do think all teams should have to get in compliance.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike - Montreal on Feb 4, 2014 13:38:52 GMT -5
Step off and cease being a tool bag. I know Sal was a little long winded in his explanation of this - but shouldn't we be enforcing league rules for all teams? Otherwise what is the point... |
|
|
|
Post by Glenn-Philadelphia on Feb 4, 2014 14:15:56 GMT -5
Step off and cease being a tool bag. I know Sal was a little long winded in his explanation of this - but shouldn't we be enforcing league rules for all teams? Otherwise what is the point... Being long winded has nothing to do with it. What I take exception to is his trolling by suggesting that people that are friends of mine, or relatives, get preferential treatment. It has been discussed on here prior and I have much more important things to do then re-hash the issue again. It is Sal's MO to try to stir up shit storms for what I can only imagine is his pleasure. Fuck that. |
|
|
|
Post by John-Michigan on Feb 4, 2014 15:20:43 GMT -5
I also have 6
|
|
|
|
Post by Scott-New Jersey on Feb 4, 2014 15:49:16 GMT -5
To make the teams in compliance we need to have 7 more goalies. We have 8 goalies stashed in the prospect pools. May be its time to take a look at another way of doing those kinda contracts. And yes we need to enforce the rules just to bad we could not make one for being a fucktard.
|
|
|
|
Post by Phil-Cornwall on Feb 4, 2014 16:18:42 GMT -5
I too think we should tackle this one RIGHT QUICK as it's potentially easy to get outa the way.
1. Should we only require 4 goalies ? I think this is good /realistic
2. If not and 5 is still the requirement...then lets just whip up some real life ECHL 10/10 guys for 100k and knock this rules lapse out right now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dane-Hamilton on Feb 4, 2014 16:33:03 GMT -5
5 goalies, no more no less would solve this.
|
|
|
|
Post by Glenn-Philadelphia on Feb 4, 2014 16:46:02 GMT -5
I too think we should tackle this one RIGHT QUICK as it's potentially easy to get outa the way. 1. Should we only require 4 goalies ? I think this is good /realistic 2. If not and 5 is still the requirement...then lets just whip up some real life ECHL 10/10 guys for 100k and knock this rules lapse out right now. Hershey has 43k of cap space so this is not a good option. The other reason this is not a good option is that these players do not have a solid player id number (key) that is required for everything from contract tracking to stats. |
|
|
|
Post by Scott-New Jersey on Feb 4, 2014 20:24:12 GMT -5
All teams out of compliance at the start of the year, all star break , and end of the season should be docked X amount of Fpts. We should look at getting rid of the prospect pool and move to a bridge deal/age RFA system. That would make more goalies/players for all the teams and no excuse for not enough players for teams.
|
|
